OUT-OF-SCHOOL SUSPENSIONS HAVE NO ACADEMIC BENEFIT
National data on suspensions
and expulsions show that out-of-school suspension is not only a
frequently used option for managing student discipline, but is also
applied disproportionately with students in particular subgroup
populations, including race, gender and disability status.
Research also indicates that frequent use of
out-of-school suspensions is often associated with low achievement,
increased risk for dropping out and a greater likelihood of juvenile
justice involvement. In other words, out-of-school suspensions do the
exact opposite of what they are intended to do.
Even so, according to data collected by the
California Department of Education, during the 2009/2010 school year,
California schools issued 765,000 out-of-school suspensions. That’s
enough students suspended out-of-school to fill every seat in all the
professional baseball and football stadiums in the state, with no
guarantee of any adult supervision.
As shocking as these statistics are, the point
remains that if, however, out-of-school suspensions are making schools
safer and more productive for the non-suspended students thus enabling
them to stay in school longer, learn more, and graduate at higher rates
then, perhaps the collateral damage can be justified. They do not.
States with higher suspension rates have lower
NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) scores in math,
reading, and writing. Also, higher suspending schools have below average
test scores compared to scores in demographically similar schools.
The quagmire remains how do we get students to
spend more time in school while also keeping the school environment safe
and productive so all students can learn. The
solution is a school wide positive behavior support system. It is a
decision-making framework that guides selection, integration and
implementation of the best evidenced-based practices for improving
behavior outcomes for all students.
One way to begin this process is through a school
climate survey of staff and students to assess school safety, fairness
and clarity of rules and behavior expectations. This information should
be shared with parents and other stakeholders in the community. Once new
programs and interventions have been implemented, they should be
regularly evaluated for effectiveness.
The goal is to review
resources that can be used to monitor district/school behavior data,
identify current site/district practices that provide additional
interventions and support and engage in conversations that lead to
improved outcomes for students. You can be part of the solution by asking for your children's school suspension policy and data regarding
which students are being suspended and why. For example, you may want
to know if students can be suspended for a non-violent infraction. If
so, perhaps there could be an in-house suspension policy in place.
Victor Hugo, writing in the 19th Century, maintained, “He who opens a school door, closes a prison.” This shrewd adage holds true today.
Contact Margaret Lavin at elementarydays@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment